Post by derek on Jan 6, 2013 20:30:43 GMT
Council Adopts Regulation
13th December 2012
The European Council has announced that on the 11th December 2012 the representatives of the EU member states, adopted the regulation laying down new safety and environmental requirements for the type-approval of motorcycles and other L-category motor vehicles – the so-called “anti-tampering” regulation.
The Council reports that the decision was taken without discussion. Before you get annoyed about a lack of discussion, the proposal had been discussed in-depth previously within the Council, with a consultation deadline issued for the 10th December, at the General Affairs Council meeting.
It was reported that the United Kingdom abstained from the vote with a joint statement issued by the United Kingdom and Bulgaria which was that, “The United Kingdom and Bulgaria regret that in introducing the Euro 5 stage of emissions restrictions without evidence of proportionate benefits, the principles of Better Regulation and evidence-based policy-making have not been followed.”
As the European Parliament had debated and then voted on the 20th November 2012 to approve the regulation by a huge majority (643 in favour, 16 against), the only procedure left was for the European Council to adopt the proposal regulation.
Finally, the proposed regulation is ready to enter into law on the various introduction dates for ABS (Anti-Lock Braking Systems) – Euro Emission requirements and so forth.
Delegated Acts
However the already discussed Delegated Acts which have mainly been published in their draft format in the public domain for all to see and are available through the stakeholders Motor Cycle Working Group (MCWG) have still to be finalised.
The MCWG brings together technical experts from the European Commission, member state representatives, industry and consumer groups to thrash out the finer details. The European Parliament also has scrutiny to the delegated acts.
In our opinion, this (the MCWG) is exactly where the rider organisations need to have a high profile and be right in the middle of the discussions. It’s easy to shout about demos, but the same people who criticise the Commission and parliament are, it seems to us anyway, the same people who are unwilling to stand up and be counted by contributing with technical expertise. This expertise must come from FEMA and its member organisations. The reason for this is that FEMA is effectively the only rider’s organisation recognised in Brussels by the Commission within the MCWG.
From Northern Ireland, we cannot be directly involved, simply because we do not yet have a European wide supporters’ base – although as we have done so far, we will be watching and commenting and as we have done so far, corresponding with the Commission representatives to offer our opinions and advice when asked.
“Near” Future
For the “near” future an eye needs to be kept on the progression of ABS and Emissions as the European Commission before the end of 2019, will decide, “whether to propose extending the mandatory fitting of anti-lock braking systems to categories of smaller motorcycles, after an evaluation and taking into account road accident statistics.” and by December 2016 (through a study to evaluate the air quality and the share of pollutants produced by L-category vehicles), the Commission will “report to the Council and the European Parliament on the enforcement of Euro 5 emission standards as from 2020.”
At the very start of our reporting on the regulation proposal way back in 2009, we stated our position which was , “to aim to protect the spirit and historic tradition of modifying motorcycles.”
This simple but rational statement has remained the bedrock of our position, in spite of what (or because of) we considered the hysterical and misleading reporting out in the motorcycle community from mainstream magazines to social networking sites.
Read this article – comment – view European Councils press release – on Right To Ride EU - www.righttoride.eu/?p=10718
Issued by
Trevor Baird
13th December 2012
The European Council has announced that on the 11th December 2012 the representatives of the EU member states, adopted the regulation laying down new safety and environmental requirements for the type-approval of motorcycles and other L-category motor vehicles – the so-called “anti-tampering” regulation.
The Council reports that the decision was taken without discussion. Before you get annoyed about a lack of discussion, the proposal had been discussed in-depth previously within the Council, with a consultation deadline issued for the 10th December, at the General Affairs Council meeting.
It was reported that the United Kingdom abstained from the vote with a joint statement issued by the United Kingdom and Bulgaria which was that, “The United Kingdom and Bulgaria regret that in introducing the Euro 5 stage of emissions restrictions without evidence of proportionate benefits, the principles of Better Regulation and evidence-based policy-making have not been followed.”
As the European Parliament had debated and then voted on the 20th November 2012 to approve the regulation by a huge majority (643 in favour, 16 against), the only procedure left was for the European Council to adopt the proposal regulation.
Finally, the proposed regulation is ready to enter into law on the various introduction dates for ABS (Anti-Lock Braking Systems) – Euro Emission requirements and so forth.
Delegated Acts
However the already discussed Delegated Acts which have mainly been published in their draft format in the public domain for all to see and are available through the stakeholders Motor Cycle Working Group (MCWG) have still to be finalised.
The MCWG brings together technical experts from the European Commission, member state representatives, industry and consumer groups to thrash out the finer details. The European Parliament also has scrutiny to the delegated acts.
In our opinion, this (the MCWG) is exactly where the rider organisations need to have a high profile and be right in the middle of the discussions. It’s easy to shout about demos, but the same people who criticise the Commission and parliament are, it seems to us anyway, the same people who are unwilling to stand up and be counted by contributing with technical expertise. This expertise must come from FEMA and its member organisations. The reason for this is that FEMA is effectively the only rider’s organisation recognised in Brussels by the Commission within the MCWG.
From Northern Ireland, we cannot be directly involved, simply because we do not yet have a European wide supporters’ base – although as we have done so far, we will be watching and commenting and as we have done so far, corresponding with the Commission representatives to offer our opinions and advice when asked.
“Near” Future
For the “near” future an eye needs to be kept on the progression of ABS and Emissions as the European Commission before the end of 2019, will decide, “whether to propose extending the mandatory fitting of anti-lock braking systems to categories of smaller motorcycles, after an evaluation and taking into account road accident statistics.” and by December 2016 (through a study to evaluate the air quality and the share of pollutants produced by L-category vehicles), the Commission will “report to the Council and the European Parliament on the enforcement of Euro 5 emission standards as from 2020.”
At the very start of our reporting on the regulation proposal way back in 2009, we stated our position which was , “to aim to protect the spirit and historic tradition of modifying motorcycles.”
This simple but rational statement has remained the bedrock of our position, in spite of what (or because of) we considered the hysterical and misleading reporting out in the motorcycle community from mainstream magazines to social networking sites.
Read this article – comment – view European Councils press release – on Right To Ride EU - www.righttoride.eu/?p=10718
Issued by
Trevor Baird